PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The publishing house's policy provides for double-blind review. This process involves the following:

1. First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.

2. Following the decision of the editors, the manuscripts submitted are sent to at least two external experts in the corresponding field. Both external experts and specialists from among the members of the editorial board of the journal may be involved in the review. The manuscript passes double-blind peer review, neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.

3. Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

In case of disagreement with the conclusions of the reviewers, the authors may provide the editorial office with a scientifically substantiated response to the comments provided, which will be considered by the reviewer.

Before submitting an article, read the requirements according to which our reviewers evaluate your article, and check whether your work meets the requirements.

DEADLINE REVIEWING

Deadline double-blind peer review 30–40 days

1. Once you submit your article, it will be sent for review. Our editorial staff is practicing a double-blind peer review.

2. Get response from reviewers. If adjustment is then necessary to take them into account, and return an e-mail.

3. If there are no corrections or all the remarks made by the reviewers are corrected, the article will be accepted for publication in the journal based on the results of double-blind review.

Reviewers should refrain from uploading manuscripts to the LLM software or using other LLM technologies that could lead to a breach of confidentiality.